1-on-1 Mastery-Based IB History · Taipei
IB History, from chronology to causation.
IB History rewards multi-causal historical analysis, not chronological narration. Lessons build from the historical narrative students bring toward the source analysis, comparative reasoning, and Historical Investigation the IB Paper questions, and university coursework, will demand.
What Students Learn
Mastery-based IB History at the level your child's school actually requires.
IB History is for students working through the IB Diploma Programme who want to move past historical narration toward the multi-causal analysis, source-based argument, and Historical Investigation the IB assessment tests. The program covers the full IB History Subject Guide for HL and SL. Reasoning from primary and secondary sources to claims about historical events the IB assessment can validate. Working through the source-evaluation skills the IB Paper 1 distinctively tests, including the Origin, Purpose, Value, and Limitations of historical sources. Tracing multi-causal explanations of historical change, including political, economic, social, cultural, and ideological factors that shape outcomes. Analyzing comparative historical questions, including the side-by-side examination of cases the Paper 2 essay requires. Building reasoning across continuity and change over time, including the long-arc historical thinking the IB rubric expects. Engaging with historiography, including how different historians have interpreted the same events and why. Designing and writing the Historical Investigation the IB assessment requires. These are the skills the IB Paper 1, Paper 2, and Paper 3 questions test, and the foundation any university history, law, political science, international relations, journalism, or public policy course will assume.
IB History is not advanced narration. The shift is from chronology to causation. Students move from describing what happened in sequence to explaining why events unfolded as they did, supported by multi-causal analysis and evidence drawn from primary and secondary sources. A student who can list the events leading to World War One is doing the chronological work. A student who can argue why those events together produced war, evaluate which causes were more decisive than others, and ground the argument in primary sources is doing the causation the IB assessment rewards across periods and themes. The program closes the gap between the two.
Lessons follow Harland's IB History curriculum, built to bring students to mastery of IB History content as defined by the IB Diploma Programme Subject Guide. The program runs ten units across the 2-year IB Diploma cadence, with each unit closing in an assessment that mirrors IB Paper formats and includes the analytical work the Historical Investigation requires. SL students complete the SL core covering the prescribed subject and world history topics. HL students complete the SL core plus the HL regional depth study Paper 3 examines. Lessons calibrate to your child's individual gaps and the periods their school program covers. If a student is working through the Cold War at school, the teacher works through it with the student, applying the unit's analytical structure to the questions their Paper 2 will eventually ask.
Progress shows up in places parents can see. Where your child once memorized the sequence of events leading to a war, they now reason from political, economic, and social conditions to explain why war emerged when it did. Where your child once treated historical sources as factual records, they now evaluate Origin, Purpose, Value, and Limitations to determine what each source can and cannot tell us. Where the Historical Investigation once felt like an open-ended task, it now feels like a structured argument your child can plan, research, and write against the IB rubric.
How We Teach It
IB History taught for understanding, with the score arriving as a consequence.
Harland's pedagogy is content-based learning. Multi-causal analysis, source evaluation, and the analytical depth the IB Paper 1, Paper 2, and Paper 3 questions reward develop through the periods, sources, and past papers your child is already working with. Assessments check whether the thinking holds up when the student moves to new material alone.
A student working through twentieth-century conflict works on it with their teacher, building the reasoning that connects political instability, economic conditions, and ideological currents to the causal explanations Paper 2 requires. A student moving into source analysis works on it with their teacher, applying the unit's analytical structure to the Origin, Purpose, Value, and Limitations the IB Paper 1 distinctively tests. A student working through historiographical interpretation works on it with their teacher, building the scaffolding that lets them weigh different historians' arguments, identify the evidence each interpretation rests on, and form their own argued position with the rigor the IB rubric expects.
IB History students arrive with two layers under the surface. The score pressure is real. The May or November exam matters for university plans, particularly for students aiming at history, law, political science, international relations, journalism, or public policy paths, and most students know it. But beneath the score pressure is a specific cognitive challenge that defines the IB History assessment. Historical recall is not the hard part. The hard part is reading a source, evaluating what it can and cannot tell us about the past, integrating multiple causes into an argued explanation, and defending the explanation with the causation the IB rubric expects. The 1-on-1 format gives teachers room to slow down where the source-analysis ground is unfamiliar, and to keep the work rigorous without losing the student's engagement with history itself. Skill and causation develop together. Neither moves far in isolation.
The format also lets teachers calibrate within the program's structure. A student fluent with historical narrative but uncomfortable with IB source-analysis questions gets pushed toward the Paper 1-style scenarios the assessment will ask. What is this source. Who produced it and why. What does its perspective allow it to see and what does it obscure. A student strong on source analysis but weak on the comparative essay Paper 2 requires gets work calibrated to the rubric's expectations. That means refining causal argument structure, integrating evidence from across periods, organizing analysis around shared themes or contrasting cases, and writing against the criteria the IB assessment uses.
History also has an investigative dimension. The IB History Diploma Programme requires every student to complete the Historical Investigation as Internal Assessment, worth around 25 percent of the SL final grade and around 20 percent of the HL final grade. The Investigation is an independent research paper of up to 2,200 words where students choose a historical question of personal interest and analyze it across three sections: source identification and evaluation, sustained investigation, and methodological reflection. Harland's 1-on-1 IB History program supports the Investigation through every stage. Teachers help students choose a question that fits both the rubric criteria and the student's actual historical interests, identify and evaluate primary and secondary sources, work through the multi-causal analysis the rubric expects, and structure the writing against the IB assessment criteria. The Investigation matters as much as exam preparation, and the program treats it accordingly.
Curriculum and Alignment
A structured curriculum keyed to the IB History Subject Guide.
IB History at Harland follows a structured curriculum keyed to the IB History Diploma Programme Subject Guide for HL and SL. A student who completes the program has demonstrated mastery of IB History content as the IB Subject Guide defines it.
Harland's IB History runs ten units across the 2-year IB Diploma cadence, with Historical Investigation preparation integrated rather than appended. Most school IB History courses spread the same content across more class time, with Investigation work happening alongside or after class. 1-on-1 lessons don't lose time to group pacing or mixed-ability instruction, so the same core content fits in more substantive units. The time saved goes into the causation the IB Diploma assessment rewards.
Prerequisites and What Comes Next
Where IB History fits in your child's learning.
Before starting
IB History assumes prior coursework in history, typically built through pre-IB or MYP humanities, and the foundational close-reading and essay-writing skills those courses develop. IB History is reading- and writing-intensive across both papers and the Historical Investigation, and comfort with extended academic English is essential. Students arriving from a different curriculum or with uneven foundations work through gaps in foundational analytical reading before or alongside IB History proper.
One thing to know about scope. The IB History Internal Assessment, the Historical Investigation, is an independent research paper worth around 25 percent of the SL final grade and around 20 percent of the HL final grade. IB schools provide formal supervision for the Investigation, including checkpoint deadlines and final submission. Harland's 1-on-1 tutoring focuses on the historical content, the research question development, the source analysis, and the writing the IB rubric directly tests. The Investigation itself is submitted at school under supervisor oversight per IB requirements, and Harland's role is the planning, analytical, and writing work that turns a question into a strong Investigation.
The consultation and assessment class establishes whether IB History is the right starting point and whether parallel work in foundational analytical reading or Academic English would help. Some students arrive needing both English-foundation reinforcement and IB-specific support, and the lesson plan covers what's most urgent first.
What comes after
Most students complete IB History across the 2-year IB Diploma cadence, sitting either the May or November exam. Cadence varies by entry point and exam timing, with most students attending one to three sessions per week.
IB History does not have a direct successor course in the IB sequence. After the exam, the causation and source analysis the course develops carries directly into university history, law, political science, international relations, journalism, public policy, and any field that requires source-based argument and causal explanation. Students choosing History as their Extended Essay subject work with their primary teacher across the research-question, methodology, and writing stages on the Extended Essay program.
The longer-term aim of IB History is to make itself unnecessary. The program brings students to mastery of IB History content. Students sit the May or November exam, submit their IA, and the program's role ends. A parent who's no longer worried about their child's IB History work is the point of all of it.
Common Questions
Common questions about IB History at Harland.
Who is IB History at Harland for? +
My child can describe what happened in a historical event but struggles with the source analysis Paper 1 requires. Can the program help with that kind of thinking? +
What does the IB History program cover? +
How long is each lesson and how often does my child attend? +
How are lessons scheduled, and what if we need to reschedule? +
Can my child begin IB History over the summer? +
How do you measure progress? +
How do we begin? +
Take the next step
Start a conversation about your child's IB History.
Every Harland relationship begins with a consultation, followed by an assessment class for your child. Tell us about your goals and where your child is now.
Start the conversation