1-on-1 Essay Competition Coaching · Grades 9–12 · Taipei

Essay Competitions, from argument to scholarship.

Essay competition coaching for Grades 9–12 international school students entering the John Locke Institute Global Essay Prize. The program builds research depth in the student's chosen subject category, develops the scholarly argument the competition rewards, and carries the student from topic selection through final submission within the competition's annual cycle.

Audience
Grades 9–12, international school students
Format
1-on-1, 1 to 1.5 hours per lesson
Duration
Annual cycle, typically 4 to 9 months of preparation
Begin
Complimentary consultation & assessment class

What Students Learn

Essay coaching at the level John Locke examiners reward.

Parents come to Essay Competitions at Harland looking for a coach who reads scholarly essays critically, who knows what works in the genre, and who can help their child take a hard question and produce a piece of writing the John Locke examiners will take seriously. The program covers what a competition essay requires. Reading deeply enough in the chosen subject category to argue from the source material, not around it. Building a thesis precise enough to defend and contestable enough to be worth defending. Structuring the argument across the 2,000-word ceiling so that every paragraph earns its place. Engaging the strongest counter-position the argument faces. Revising under the scrutiny of a coach who reads the way the examiners will. These are the skills behind every essay that places well, because John Locke examiners read for original thinking.

School essays and competition essays reward different things. School essays reward coverage. The John Locke prize rewards conviction. A student who summarizes what philosophers, economists, or historians have said about a question is doing something different from a student who uses those thinkers to build a position of their own. Winning essays take a clear position on a hard question, defend it under scholarly scrutiny, and follow the argument where it leads, even when that destination sits uncomfortably with conventional answers. Most international school writing instruction prepares students for the first kind of essay. Essay Competitions is where the second kind gets coached.

Essay Competitions follows a unit-based pathway tied to the John Locke annual cycle. Pathways typically span three to four units depending on the student's starting point and timeline. A student starting in late summer or early autumn for the following year's cycle has runway for foundational reading, thesis development, drafting, and revision. A student entering closer to the spring topic release moves through a compressed pathway, prioritizing what the competition cycle most demands at that stage. Each unit closes in a defined deliverable: an annotated reading list and working thesis, a scaffolded first draft, a revised draft with research-supported refinements, a submission-ready essay. After each unit, the pathway is reviewed and adjusted around what the unit has revealed. Harland's program decides what gets coached. The student's argument on the chosen question is what the essay needs to surface honestly. That is what John Locke examiners most want to see.

Progress shows up in places parents can see. A student who can articulate a precise thesis instead of a topic. Reading habits that go beyond Wikipedia summaries into the primary sources. Drafts where each paragraph advances the previous one. A finished essay submitted on time, with the student's argument intact and the prose tight enough to fit the 2,000-word frame.

How We Teach It

Essay competitions coached through the argument each student is building.

Harland's pedagogy is content-based learning. Research depth, argumentative structure, and scholarly writing develop through the essay the student is working toward, not through generic practice prompts. Lessons center on the student's chosen question in their chosen category, read by a coach who knows what John Locke examiners read for.

For Grades 9–12, that means lessons calibrated directly to the student's essay at each unit. A student in their topic-research unit reads through the source material on their chosen question, identifying with their coach which thinkers, frameworks, or evidence the essay will need to engage and which can be set aside. A student in their first-draft unit shapes their thesis into an argument across the 2,000-word frame, working with their coach on the structure that lets the thesis carry the essay rather than the essay carrying the thesis. A student in their revision unit defends their argument against the strongest counter-positions, tightens the prose, and moves through the techniques that turn a competent essay into one a scholarly reader will recognize.

Writing a competition essay is also a question of intellectual independence. Some students read widely but struggle to commit to a position. Some students hold strong views but haven't yet earned them through reading. The 1-on-1 format gives coaches room to think in real time on the page with the student. They challenge the argument as it develops, asking the questions the examiners will ask. They distinguish what the student is claiming from what they have shown on the page. Skill and intellectual independence develop together. Neither moves far in isolation.

The format also lets coaches calibrate to the student's specific starting point. A student strong in argument but light on subject knowledge spends early units building the reading foundation the essay will rest on. A student deep in the subject but unsure how to shape an argument spends early units on thesis development and essay architecture. A student returning from a prior John Locke attempt addresses the specific gap the previous essay revealed. Each pathway begins where the student is.

Curriculum and Competition Cycle

A pathway tied to the John Locke annual cycle.

Essay Competitions at Harland follows a unit-based pathway tied to the John Locke Institute Global Essay Prize annual cycle. Prompts are released across ten subject categories each spring. Senior entries are due by 30 June with a 2,000-word maximum, judged by Oxford and Cambridge academics on knowledge and understanding, strength and originality of argument, and clarity of expression. The Harland pathway is built around that cycle, with each unit closing in a deliverable that measures the student's readiness for the next stage.

The program is built against the John Locke Institute's published requirements and judging criteria. Subject categories cover Philosophy, Politics, Economics, History, Psychology, Theology, Law, Public Policy, International Relations, and Science & Technology. Students typically choose one category and one prompt within it, though entries across multiple categories are permitted. Where a student's school has already prepared them in a relevant domain (Theory of Knowledge essays, Extended Essays, AP Capstone research, IGCSE Global Perspectives), the Student Coordinator translates that prior preparation into specific lesson goals. The official competition rules, prompts, and timeline are published annually by the John Locke Institute, and we build to those as they release. The same research and argumentative skill prepares students for the Cambridge Re:think Essay Competition and other prestigious essay prizes where Harland's subject specialists can credibly coach. In every case, Harland's program provides the spine.

Standards
John Locke Institute submission requirements (2,000-word maximum, ten Senior subject categories, under-19 eligibility, original-work requirement) and the published judging criteria the essay is read against
Materials
The student's drafts, the current year's category prompts, primary and secondary sources in the chosen discipline, prior years' published winning essays used as study material rather than as templates
Assessment
Unit-by-unit deliverables: annotated reading list and working thesis, scaffolded first draft, revised draft, submission-ready essay
Reporting
Per-lesson written record covering reading completed, drafting decisions, and revisions made. Unit-completion progress reports.

Prerequisites and What Comes Next

Where Essay Competitions fits in your child's learning.

Before starting

Essay Competitions assumes strong English fluency at international school level and the analytical writing foundation that comes from solid academic writing through Grades 9–10. Students whose written argument or essay structure needs additional foundation often benefit from Analytical Writing (Grades 6–12) as preparation. Students whose close-reading habit is still developing often benefit from Analytical Reading (Grades 6–12) alongside.

For students entering John Locke for the first time, the consultation and assessment class establishes which category and prompt fit the student best, and where the pathway should begin. For students returning after a prior attempt, the conversation starts from the previous essay and what it revealed. For students on a compressed timeline before submission, the pathway prioritizes what the cycle most demands at that stage. The Student Coordinator helps you choose the entry point that fits.

What comes after

The pathway closes at submission. There is no next unit to continue at within the same cycle, because the submitted essay is the destination. Students continuing in the genre often enter the following year's cycle at a more advanced starting point, or pursue Independent Research Projects for deeper research arcs that run beyond a 2,000-word frame. Students moving toward university applications often continue with College Application Essays, where the essay craft built here transfers into application writing. Each move is a decision the family makes after submission.

The longer-term aim of Essay Competitions is to make itself unnecessary. The program brings students to the point where they have submitted an essay they are proud of, in their own argument, that says something worth saying about a question that matters to them. Whether or not the essay places in the competition, the development is real and visible: in how the student reads, how they argue, how they think on the page. Universities reading these students' applications see grit, perseverance, and the determination to take a hard question seriously and follow it through. A parent who is no longer worried about whether their child can take a serious question and run with it is the point of all of it.

Common Questions

Common questions about Essay Competitions at Harland.

Who is Essay Competitions at Harland for? +
Essay Competitions is for Grades 9–12 students at international schools entering the John Locke Institute Global Essay Prize. Most of our students fall into one of three patterns. Some are strong academic writers who want a coach who reads competition essays critically and knows what John Locke examiners look for. Some have a strong intellectual interest in a specific subject (philosophy, economics, history) and want to develop a serious essay in that domain. Some are returning students refining a stronger entry after a previous attempt.
My child writes well in school but their essay drafts read more like school essays than competition entries. Is Essay Competitions right? +
Yes, in most cases. The gap between strong school writing and an essay that examiners will recognize as scholarly is the main thing Essay Competitions addresses. The coaching focuses on the moves underneath a competition essay that lands. How a thesis becomes contestable enough to be worth defending. How research depth shows up in the argument itself. How an essay engages the strongest counter-position the argument faces. How the prose carries scholarly weight within the 2,000-word frame.
Can my child begin Essay Competitions over the summer? +
Yes. For Essay Competitions, summer is one of the strongest runway windows. The John Locke cycle releases prompts each spring and closes submissions on 30 June, which means summer is when students who want to enter the following year's competition have the most uninterrupted time to read deeply in their chosen subject category. Many students use 6 to 8 weeks over summer to build the foundational reading and argumentation skill the essay will rest on, well before the spring drafting cycle begins. See Summer Enrollment for full details.
What does the program cover? +
The program centers on the John Locke Institute Global Essay Prize, with subject categories spanning Philosophy, Politics, Economics, History, Psychology, Theology, Law, Public Policy, International Relations, and Science & Technology. Pathways typically span three to four units depending on starting point and timeline: a topic and research unit, a first-draft unit, a revision unit, and a final-polish and submission unit. Each unit closes in a defined deliverable. Students entering across multiple categories follow the same pathway in parallel, with the Student Coordinator helping calibrate cadence to the load.
Does Harland coach for other essay competitions beyond John Locke? +
Yes. The Cambridge Re:think Essay Competition is the second competition we actively coach for, with a similar research-driven approach and Oxbridge-level judging. Other competitions are coachable when Harland has the subject specialist to credibly support the coaching. The Student Coordinator helps you decide which competitions fit your child's strengths and university goals.
How long is each lesson and how often does my child attend? +
Lessons are 1-on-1 sessions of 1 to 1.5 hours, in person at our head office in Da'an or online. Cadence varies by unit. Early units (topic research and thesis development) typically run at one lesson per week. Drafting and revision units typically run at one to two lessons per week, with intensity ramping as the submission deadline approaches. Students entering on a compressed timeline may run at two or three lessons per week. The Student Coordinator helps you choose the cadence that fits.
How are lessons scheduled, and what if we need to reschedule? +
Lessons happen on a fixed weekly slot reserved with your child's primary coach. This protects the coach's time and keeps a consistent rhythm for your child. If you need to reschedule, give us at least 24 hours of notice and we'll find another time when your coach is available. Many families add lessons during summer or winter vacation, either to accelerate progress or to make up for a slower term. The Student Coordinator walks through the details when you enroll.
How do you measure progress? +
Progress is measured against the unit deliverables. Topic and research unit progress is tracked through the annotated reading list and the working thesis. Drafting unit progress is tracked through the scaffolded first draft. Revision unit progress is tracked through successive drafts moving toward the submission-ready essay. Parents receive updates after every lesson and unit-completion progress reports. After each unit, the pathway is reviewed and adjusted around what the unit has revealed. Where helpful, the Student Coordinator translates this into the rhythm of the submission cycle.
How do we begin? +
Every Harland relationship begins with a consultation, followed by a 1-on-1 assessment class. The consultation is about your goals and your child's situation. The assessment class is about how your child works in the subject. Together they tell us where to start and what kind of coach will fit best.

Take the next step

Start a conversation about your child's essay competitions.

Every Harland relationship begins with a consultation, followed by an assessment class for your child. Tell us about your goals and where your child is now.

Start the conversation