1-on-1 Debate & Rhetoric Tutoring · Grades 7–12 · Taipei
Debate & Rhetoric, from argument to advocacy.
Skill development for Grades 7–12 students who need to argue clearly, present convincingly, and think on their feet under questioning. Lessons cover argumentation, rhetoric, public speaking, and critical thinking, calibrated to your child's school context and the kinds of academic work where these skills get tested.
What Students Learn
Argument and rhetoric at the level your child's school actually requires.
Parents come to Debate & Rhetoric at Harland looking for the skills debate develops. Critical thinking, analytical thinking, public speaking, and the kind of self-confidence that comes from arguing a position and defending it under pressure. The work covers the argumentation and rhetorical skills international school students are typically assessed on from Grade 7 onward. Developing a thesis and tracing it through sustained argument, written or spoken. Building claims with evidence and reasoning. Anticipating counterargument and responding with rigor. Constructing rhetorical strategy that carries an audience. Delivering with presence, pacing, and emphasis. Handling questions and cross-examination without losing the argument. These are the skills behind every academic context where students are asked to defend a position, and most international school curricula assume students apply them without teaching them in depth.
Argument and advocacy are different skills. A student can produce a clean argumentative essay that meets every rubric requirement and freeze when asked to defend the same position aloud. Schools expect this transition somewhere between Grade 7 and Grade 10, and it isn't always taught explicitly. Debate & Rhetoric is where the transition gets taught.
The work follows Harland's leveled Debate & Rhetoric curriculum, which matches international school grade expectations. A student in Grade 7 enrolls in Level 7. Each level breaks into four units of eleven lessons. The eleventh lesson of Units 1, 2, and 3 produces a complete in-program skill demonstration, typically a structured argumentative speech, debate exercise, or formal presentation. The fourth unit closes with a sustained argument and live defense, where the student delivers a researched argumentative speech and responds to questioning. Lessons calibrate to your child's school context and the academic work where these skills get tested. If the student is preparing for a humanities class debate in Grade 8, the teacher works through the position with them, helping them build the argument using the unit's argumentation strategies. Harland's curriculum decides what gets developed. The student's academic context is where the development gets tested.
Progress shows up in places parents can see. Stronger performance in classroom presentations and humanities essays. More confident contributions to family discussions and dinner table conversations. Greater willingness to defend a position rather than give the safe answer. School feedback shifting from "good content but rushed delivery" or "follows the structure but lacks conviction" toward "persuasive argument" or "clear and confident."
How We Teach It
Argument taught through the work your child is producing.
Harland's pedagogy is content-based learning. Argumentation, rhetorical craft, and presentation skills develop through the actual arguments and presentations your child is preparing for school. Generic public speaking drills rarely transfer to the humanities class debate or argumentative presentation a teacher is grading next week. The curriculum's assessments check whether the skills hold up when the student stands up to argue a position on their own.
For Grades 7–12, that means lessons that work directly with school contexts at the level the school is asking for. A Grade 8 student preparing for a humanities class debate works on the position with their teacher, building the argument and rehearsing the rebuttal. A Grade 10 student presenting an extended argumentative essay to class shapes the delivery with their teacher across multiple drafts, working from thesis through evidence integration to the live presentation. A Grade 12 student preparing for university interviews or senior English oral defense exercises rehearses with their teacher on argument architecture and live defense under questioning.
Argument is also a question of confidence. Some students freeze when asked to defend a position aloud, defaulting to the safe answer because being wrong in front of an audience feels too risky. The 1-on-1 format gives teachers room to work in real time on the thinking that produces argument. They watch the student build a position and stress-test it through questioning. It also lets the work feel like a conversation about what the student thinks, which is where confidence comes from. Skill and confidence develop together. Neither moves far in isolation.
The format also lets teachers calibrate within the level's structure. A student strong in written argument but uncomfortable speaking aloud gets pushed harder on delivery and live defense. A student fluent in delivery but thin on argumentation works on claim construction and evidence handling until the substance carries the speaking. Each lesson plan sits where the student's actual gap is.
Curriculum and Alignment
A structured curriculum that aligns with your child's school.
Debate & Rhetoric at Harland follows a leveled curriculum keyed to international school grade expectations. A student who completes a level has demonstrated debate and rhetorical skills at that grade level across all components of the curriculum.
Lessons coordinate with whichever academic context emphasizes argument and presentation skills for your child's school. The curriculum tracks against the speaking and listening standards within Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts at Grades 7 through 12, IGCSE English Language oral assessment requirements, and the IB Language & Literature individual oral component. Where a school emphasizes its own debate or speech format, including Public Forum, World Schools, Lincoln-Douglas, or similar, the Student Coordinator translates that into lesson goals. This includes the bilingual departments at private schools that build their own argument and presentation curricula. In every case, Harland's curriculum provides the spine.
Prerequisites and What Comes Next
Where Debate & Rhetoric fits in your child's learning.
Before starting
Debate & Rhetoric assumes strong English fluency at international school level. Students still building core comprehension fit better in Reading Comprehension (Grades 3–8) or Academic English (Grades 3–12) first, where the focus is on the foundational reading and language work that argument and rhetoric build on.
Students whose written argument needs equal focus often benefit from Analytical Writing (Grades 6–12) as a parallel program. Many strong oral arguers find their written argument develops slower than their verbal argument. Pairing the two builds both. The consultation and assessment class establishes which program fits and which level is appropriate. Some students arrive needing more than one, and the lesson plan covers what's most urgent first.
What comes after
Most students complete a level in 6 to 12 months, depending on starting position and lesson cadence. At completion, families have a clear decision point.
If your child needs more work at higher grade levels, they continue at the next Debate & Rhetoric level. Many students continue across multiple grade levels, deepening their argument and presentation skills as the academic work asks more of them.
Students whose strengths in argument translate to written work often combine continued Debate & Rhetoric with Analytical Writing. Students preparing for AP English Language find the program's rhetorical work transfers directly to AP coursework. Students considering competitive debate at tournament level may pursue dedicated competitive debate coaching as a next step. Students approaching university applications often combine continued debate work with College Application Essays, where argument structure and personal voice both matter. Each move is a decision the family makes at level completion.
The longer-term aim of Debate & Rhetoric is to make itself unnecessary. The program brings students to the point where they can argue clearly and present convincingly under pressure, and after that, they don't need this specific program. Some families step the cadence down to maintain. Others finish a level and stop. Some move on to AP, IB, competitive debate, or other targeted offerings as their academic goals evolve. All are good outcomes. A parent who's no longer worried about how confidently their child can argue under pressure is the point of all of it.
Common Questions
Common questions about Debate & Rhetoric at Harland.
Who is Debate & Rhetoric at Harland for? +
My child writes well but struggles to argue out loud, or argues confidently but their reasoning falls apart under questioning. Is Debate & Rhetoric right? +
What debate and rhetoric skills does the program cover? +
How long is each lesson and how often does my child attend? +
How are lessons scheduled, and what if we need to reschedule? +
How do you measure progress? +
How do we begin? +
Take the next step
Start a conversation about your child's argument and presentation work.
Every Harland relationship begins with a consultation, followed by an assessment class for your child. Tell us about your goals and where your child is now.
Start the conversation